I'm pretty sure this was working but i concur something is not right. I get different behavior to you. I just can't get any offset to work it always starts with the first array element despite what number you enter as an offset. In your examples you list Expected result: as {1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}. I thin...

Ralph wrote: ↑Sun Sep 02, 2018 9:19 am Isn't it just a matter of swapping the pin names in the script?

That's certainly the quickest and easiest way to correct it

Tony.

But apparently now it isn't that straightforward anymore. Please fix this and make it watertight again. The current state of this function/explanation is not only incorrect according to the manual, it's also counter intuitive at this moment. The encoder direction is correct. I get it's been reverse...

Nice one Jon,

Glad to see you got to grips with that inter instrument code.

Tony

I've been having similar issues. If you are using X-plane you could try changing as follows to see if your issue is similar. locate every xpl_dataref_subscribe and replace every xpl_dataref_subscribe( with variable_subscribe("XPLANE", so as an example the beacon light changes from xpl_data...

I agree Corjan, I think the balance you refer to here is the key. We try to keep a healthy mix between paid and community instruments. I'm a bit confused as to how this currently works as I don't have any premium panels. Just so I am clear is the panel protected or the instruments? Can instruments i...

Gilles,

Arturo is correct. They are shift registers. One of the main features of shift registers is you can daisy chain them. It makes no sense not to do it this way. It saves on a lot of I/O lines. Perhaps your modules are not setup this way but you could possibly modify them if required.

Tony

Not talking about Air Manager specifically here but just generally.

It's also about preserving the quality of the original and not wanting your name and reputation tarnished by a modified product that is not as you intended. In can work for the better but all to often it's for the worse.

Tony

Thanks. This 3.5 beta is gonna take some testing with all the new features and bug fixes. Look forward to it.

Tony

Mark, Some interesting thoughts. I certainly agree that selective protection for instruments would be very desirable. For the purposes of this discussion I would also include the panel itself as a item to be protected. It would then be down to the developer to determine which instruments and panel a...